Foodie Fiasco Fiasco Flair

Foodie Fiasco

Happiness, decadence, and loose pants

  • Home
  • About
    • Contact
    • About Me
    • FAQs
  • Resources
  • fias/CO
  • Bloglovin
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Snapchat
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Recipes
    • To-Make List
    • Recipes
  • Vegan
  • Low Carb
  • Paleo
  • Gluten Free

Related Posts

  • How to Make Chocolate (or pb) Chip Sconies
  • Nutter Butter Stuffed Chocolate Cookies
  • Copycat Oatmeal Creme Pies {And a Shopping Spree!}
  • Homemade Healthy Samoas (Vegan/Gluten Free/Low Carb/Paleo)

How to Correctly Count Calories

Filed Under: How To, Uncategorized

By Kelly M 62 Comments Jump to Recipe

Chances are you’re doing it wrong. I’m sorry.

However, if you don’t care about the caloric information of anything ever, then feel free to just breeze on by and come back for cookies later! But for us humans who want to know this monumental secret I will most likely be referring back to for a long time, I recommend sticking around. Good thing I’m totally not biased or anything.

I cannot tell you how many questions/comments/emails/moderately panicked calls for help I get regarding this very topic. People (most often times very politely, so thank you) point out that my nutritional information is wrong, and that the actual stats are higher. It’s not wrong, folks. I just happen to know this little secret on how to correctly count calories, and I’m ready to let you all into the loop.

Ready? Okay. There’s this magical concept called a “net carb”, which is often used by people on diets such as Atkins or Paleo when carb counting, but it usually just ends there. I, on the other hand, have taken it a step further with the subsequent “net calorie. ”

First, some interesting/dorky background on biology and the composition of calories. The four major classifications of biological molecules are proteins, carbohydrates, lipids (fats), and nucleic acids (but we won’t be dealing with these today). You probably encounter the first three a lot in everyday life, especially on nutritional labels.

The calories in food come from proteins, carbohydrates, and fats. A gram of protein has 4 calories, a gram of carbohydrate has 4 calories, and a gram of fat has 9 calories. With a bit of simple math, you can verify that on any food label. Sometimes there is a discrepancy, and I always honor the caloric product I got after I plugged in my formula.

Let’s practice! This is a nutritional label from Regular Better ‘n Peanut Butter.

 

Does it work? Grams of protein x 4 (16) + grams of carb x 4 (52) + grams of fat x 9 (18) = 86 calories! Sometimes there are actually fewer calories than stated because the company overcompensates. That’s very respectable of the company, and a happy accident for us consumers!

However, it doesn’t always work like that. Here is a label for Fiber One Original.

Let’s try it again: Grams of protein x 4 (8) + grams of carb x 4 (100) + grams of fat x 9 (9) = 117 calories. Hmm. That’s way off from the stated 60! Why is Fiber One allowed to say that? The FDA allows for a 20% discrepancy in food labeling, but this is much farther off than 20%. What gives?

So back to biology, there are many different kinds of carbohydrate molecules, and saying that they ALL have 4 calories a gram is simply incorrect. One of the reasons celery is such a low calorie food is that it contains a significant amount of cellulose, a fibrous carbohydrate that is indigestible by the human body. Therefore, if your body cannot break something down, it can’t absorb any energy from it. Calories that your body actually absorbs are called net calories.

You know how fiber is nature’s broom? That’s true too. Fiber “sweeps” through your system, cleaning out any unneeded particles and, because your body does not break fiber down, it goes out the other end. Your body does not absorb the calories from fiber either.

However, the traditional calorie counting formula does not take this into account. It would multiply ALL of the carbs in the product by four, instead of just the ones your body actually absorbs (total carbohydrates – dietary fiber). Behold, my modified and correct calorie counting formula!

This concept is relatively widely accepted here in the US, but the FDA has not taken a stance on the subject. (For reference, here is a Hungry Girl article on this very topic.) In the meantime, this gives companies selling products in the United States free rein to take the initiative and use this concept to their advantage. Some companies, such as Fiber One, do just that.

And now for your first application of your new favorite formula. Please contain your enthusiasm and hold your thunderous applause until the end. Grams of protein x 4 (8) + grams of fat x 9 (9) + grams of total carbohydrates – grams of fiber x 4 (44) = 61 calories (rounded down to 60 on the label). Whoa. Considering we thought the exact same serving of the exact same product had 117 calories just a minute ago, this is big. Huge.

Now you can start applying this to your daily life! Remember not to eat too much fiber as that is very hard on your GI track (and gives you plenty of gas; fun for all!), and do this, as well as everything else you do, in moderation.

I’m not going to lie… it still is pretty fun to do. You’re like Sherlock with a nutritional label. (I told you tweed would look awesome with your eyes!) Let’s take another look at the peanut butter label!

Grams of protein x 4 (16) + grams of fat x 9 (18) + grams of total carbohydrates – grams of fiber x 4 (44) = 78 calories. People. That’s 39 calories a tablespoon. Go forth and preach, grasshoppers.

I hope that clears things up! This is the method I use when calculating the nutritional information for all my recipes. Feel free to use it for whenever you want, but please slip my name into the conversation if at all possible… nudge, nudge. Spread the word! This is big!

 

 

What do you think? Do you have any nutrition questions or knowledge you’d like to share? Let the (friendly) discussion begin!

 

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • X

Related Posts

  • Pumpkin Pie (Vegan/Gluten Free/Grain Free/Sugar Free/Low Carb/Low Calorie)
  • Blueberry Stuffed Low Carb “Cocomeal”
  • Healthy Chocolate Cookie Dough Bars
  • Easy Low Carb Dinner Rolls

Filed Under: How To, Uncategorized

About Kelly M

« Low Fat Vegan Pumpkin Mac and Cheeze
Guest Post: Ellen’s Spectacular Veggie Loaf »

Comments

  1. Kristy @ Southern In Law says

    February 18, 2013 at 12:13 am

    I love math, but I definitely don't want my food to become a math problem - or a problem in itself! Our bodies aren't calculators, even though our brains may be.
    Reply
  2. Lift, Sleep, Eat says

    February 18, 2013 at 4:37 am

    It's great! Means more delicious food we can eat when we thought the portions we were eating equated to more calories! It pretty much means most veggies have 0 calories when their fibre content etc is taken into account. Yummmyyy
    Reply
  3. Michelle @ Eat Move Balance says

    February 18, 2013 at 7:24 am

    I'm such a geek about all the numbers, too. Hello--I'm a high school math teacher. I live for it. :) Question though: shouldn't the last calculation be 44 calories (13-2 = 11, and then times by 4). Great post--you made it so easy to follow! Thanks.
    Reply
  4. Jackie says

    February 18, 2013 at 10:16 am

    Hallelujah! My saving grace has been born! This clears alot of things up. Thanks so much Kelly!!!
    Reply
    • Kelly M says

      February 18, 2013 at 8:00 pm

      Thank you so much Jackie, and I'm just glad I could help!
      Reply
  5. Erin Nichols says

    February 18, 2013 at 11:10 am

    Whoa...this is huge! I just calculated a few recipes. One was correct...giver or take one or two, and one was off by closer to 20 because of the fiber. This is very interesting and will make me look much harder at the nutrition labels...didn't know I could look at them any more than I already do! I hate people who nit-pick, but I did want to point out that when you look at the pb nutrition label the 2nd time at the end of your post, you calculated the protein as 4 grams times 2 (8) instead of 4 grams times 4. (16). It doesn't make a big difference, but... :) Thanks for sharing this! This gives me a great deal to thing about!
    Reply
  6. Chris says

    February 18, 2013 at 11:39 am

    Your efforts to count correctly are commendable, but please note you are not making the distinction between soluble and insoluble fiber. While it is true insoluble fiber does not get absorbed at all, soluble fiber ferments in the GI tract and contributes an effective 2 calories/gram. This is confounded by the fact that nutrition labels often do not break down this distinction. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dietary_fiber#Fiber_and_calories Some recommended deeper reading into the history of calorie measurement and how the 9/4/4 numbers came to be: http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/79/5/899S.long#ref-28
    Reply
  7. Kae says

    February 18, 2013 at 1:56 pm

    I am taking a nutrition class right now and according to our teacher, the FDA hasn't taken a stance on fiber yet because people are still debating how fiber is digested. Evidently some people think soluble and insoluble fiber are digested differently and that you can get 'some' calories from fiber. Some scientists have suggested calculating 2 calories per gram of fiber just to be safe, but NO ONE AGREES ON ANYTHING (as usual). So I'm just going to take your advice and not count fiber and get to eat more ;)
    Reply
  8. Mary says

    February 18, 2013 at 5:59 pm

    wow, thanks! i didn't think there was any more to calorie counting than just reading off the nutrition label, thanks for the info!
    Reply
    • Kelly M says

      February 18, 2013 at 7:59 pm

      I hope I could help!
      Reply
  9. Bek @ Crave says

    February 18, 2013 at 6:57 pm

    Very interesting- definitely gave me something to consider :)
    Reply
    • Kelly M says

      February 18, 2013 at 8:36 pm

      Why thank you, Bek dear. ;)
      Reply
  10. Jun says

    February 19, 2013 at 6:11 am

    Wow, this post is truly an eye-opener! I think it's amazing how you actually stop and look deeper into this matter, then make the effort to share with us such a great piece of knowledge! Thanks! Don't worry, with or without cookies, I still love reading your blog! :)
    Reply
  11. alek says

    February 21, 2013 at 6:55 pm

    Im sorry to be the only not so nice comment here BUT I knew this stuff last year at your age and it is great that you are educating and helping others but truly at our age we don't need to worry about this kind of stuff AT ALL! At our age the correct way to count calories is to NOT count calories. This is just my opinion and I hope this doesn't offend you but if you want to talk feel free to check out my blog and email me!
    Reply
    • Alyssa says

      March 6, 2013 at 12:20 pm

      agree. agree. agree. the best way to do whatever you find calorie counting useful for (weight loss/gain, muscle building/cutting, overall health) is to simply AVOID counting calories. to kelly, and her devoted readers: eat real, nutrient-dense foods that supply your body with what it needs. deprivation only sets you up for failure. i encourage you to learn what intuitive eating is. counting calories very easily turns obsessive, ESPECIALLY particularly with someone, like you, kelly, who admits to a history with weight loss through disordered eating. now, tell me, why would you continue to promote something that even you deemed incredibly obsessive and unhealthy? it's already one thing that your blog inculcates the knowledge of every single calorie in each recipe. it's another to make a post labeling it as a "fun" thing to do. it's not fun. it's an obsession. it's a disorder.
      Reply
      • Kelly M says

        March 16, 2013 at 10:04 pm

        Hi Alek and Alyssa. I do appreciate your input, but please let me explain my point of view. Alek, I admire your journey. I do. Overcoming what you have overcome and knowing what you do at our age is great. As for me and counting calories, I put on weight very easily. I have to be aware of what I'm eating if I want to simply maintain my weight. When I stopped counting calories entirely back in January 2012, I gained 9 pounds in one month. I do exercise regularly, but this is just a reality for me. Now, I approximate calories every once in awhile to see where I am, but I certainly don't do it everyday (THAT is neurotic and unhealthy). I would like to talk with you at some point, and no, I am not offended. Alyssa, I do appreciate your input, but please allow me to defend myself. Please do not accuse me of having an eating disorder. It is not true, (I have seen multiple nutritional/medical experts who agree with this.) If I don't post calories counts, (I didn't for about the first year, please look in my archives) I will get many comments and emails asking for them. I still have to go through old recipes and add calorie counts due to popular demand. When I do post the calorie counts, people leave comments asking if they're wrong. Then I have to leave a long response on why they're not wrong. Soto save time (and inevitably sleep) I wrote a post to explain my calculation methods. When I publish the post, I am accused of having an eating disorder. I don't. I'm just trying to answer questions and make it easier for everyone. Thanks, and enjoy the rest of your weekend!
        Reply
        • Alek says

          March 25, 2013 at 8:59 am

          Thank you for replying Kelly! I guess if that is your story I understand. I am sorry that you gain weight so easily but by doing exercise especially lifting or HIIT you can try to help your metabolism so that doesn't happen. I am happy I didn't offend you but I still think being your age you should try to just live life without all the stresses of a blog. Even if you enjoy writing you have to admit you feel an obligation to write and some times you don't always feel like it. At your age just have fun before high school actually forces you some stress. Make good friends to keep over summer and into high school. A blog may seem to be a friend and bring you friends but friends in person are also important.
          Reply
          • Katie says

            August 23, 2013 at 10:58 am

            Alek, There are people in the world who gain weight easily. EVEN when they lift weights AND do HIIT, and for you to assume that those are the answers to everyone's problem is ridiculous. There are a myriad of reasons people gain weight and how they effectively loose it, have you heard of people gaining weight because of thyroid problems, food allergies etc..? I respect and admire Kelly for making this blog and for you to assume she doesn't have friends because of it is probably just a projection of your lack of friends. She seems like a really cute, funny girl and I doubt she has any problems making real life friends. We need more innovative people like her. The world is too full of lazy kids, in fact I feel the current standard, like you emphasis, is to teach kids to be lazy. We need smart capable teenagers that are problem solvers and take initiative. So please don't criticize her for being a hard worker and all around amazing. You should be thanking her for all of her hard work.
        • Maureen says

          November 26, 2014 at 7:21 pm

          I for one, really appreciate having the calories info--I can and do calculate using my specific ingredients when I make something but when I am choosing what to make I like to have a ballpark figure at least. It is an interesting topic because in Canada companies can't subtract the fibre so sometimes the same product is labelled as one calorie/carb count here and the exact same product has different info in the U.S.
          Reply
          • Dulcie de Kock says

            November 29, 2014 at 5:40 pm

            I'm glad that this method of counting calories is helpful to you, Maureen! It is very strange when you pick up a food item from another country and find the calorie count level to be vastly different! It's nice having sources like this available so that, no matter the calorie count on the packages, the item will show the same amount of calories regardless of location:-)
      • JAck green says

        February 9, 2017 at 9:27 am

        Sorry to disagree on the disagreement. As a scientist with a research background on obesity.... NO diet that does not count calories and include periodic weighing on a scale is effective. I don't care what age you are. Weight gain is caused by an ignorance of the weight gained by the individual and the caloric content of their food. It's a nice thing to imagine that "eating healthy" without counting calories works but study after study shows it does NOT work. 1) what people think of as healthy is constantly changing (someone your age should remember that we thought suntanning was healthy in the 1970s). Most people imagine 2 cups of orange juice in the morning is "healthy" but is probably one of the worst things you can do to yourself every morning. 2) most people of any age have no idea of the nutrient content of their food - total calories being the most important. Knowing this helps us make intelligent decisions about which foods we should eat in a day and which we should limit. 3). Daily weighing and calorie counting can help people fend off gradual weight change before it becomes permanent weight change as well as observe the direct consequences of the food they eat. Easier to stop yourself after a month of gaining 2 0pounds than a year of gaining 24 pounds. Once a person is well versed in the calorie content of their staple foods I suppose they could just estimate but faced with an ever increasing exposure to over foods I imagine some calorie counting is an inevitable part of healthy living. Son no , I don't agree with the statement "at our age we shouldn't count calories. Curmudgeons die at 50
        Reply
  12. Megan S. says

    March 2, 2013 at 2:35 pm

    Crazy! I had never seen anything like that before- very neat and interesting :)
    Reply
  13. Charlotte says

    March 7, 2013 at 10:17 pm

    Thank you for this! I just found out that the slice of pumpernickel i was munching on only contained 80 calories, rather than the 110 it says on the pack! Bonus :p I posted your discovery on my blog, referencing back to you, of course :) Here's the link; http://eyelashetc.tumblr.com/post/44748912699/youre-counting-calories-wrong-i-just-found
    Reply
  14. Maggie Hartley says

    March 17, 2013 at 12:28 pm

    I love the formula but I have to ask, what about sugar? Doesn't that count as a carb?
    Reply
    • Kelly M says

      March 25, 2013 at 1:24 pm

      Hi Maggie! Yes, sugar does count as a carb. It is included within the carb count though, so you don't have to account for it again. For example, if something has 7 grams of carb, but it has 2 grams of fiber and 2 grams of sugar, you would just subtract the fiber to get 5 grams of carb (5 x 4 = 20 calories). Hope this helps!
      Reply
  15. Katie says

    March 21, 2013 at 8:15 pm

    Ermagerd, I think I love you! I knew fiber was good for me, but I had no idea I could use it for subtraction purposes. Thank you!
    Reply
    • Kelly M says

      March 23, 2013 at 11:12 pm

      Thank you so much Katie! I just hope I could help.
      Reply
  16. Bonnie says

    March 24, 2013 at 8:18 am

    Kudos to you, young Miss. I continuously search for the type of LOW CALORIE recipes that you post here. I am grateful to find your blog and that the calories are posted. I too, gain weight very easily. as I have all of my life. With a sweet tooth, it is so easy to justify that second serving. My husband is a diabetic, and I have Metabolic X syndrome, and wheat/gluten free for 15 years. Having experimented with different flours and sweetners for many years now, I have gained a great deal of knowledge already. (check out coconut syrup and Yacon syrup) Recipes that are high protein, no or low sugar is a health necessity for us. It is easy to eat healthy meals, but when that sweet craving comes, I need help. When I want chocolate, a Mac truck could not stop me! You are spectacularly brilliant! Thank you for sharing your gift.
    Reply
  17. Charlotte says

    August 28, 2013 at 5:15 pm

    I love this! Beautifully explained, and so easy to follow. This is really useful! Sending appreciation from the UK! X
    Reply
    • Kelly M says

      September 6, 2013 at 10:34 pm

      Thank you so much Charlotte!
      Reply
  18. Hayley says

    August 28, 2013 at 6:03 pm

    Don't know if anyone else has asked this but... What about sugars?
    Reply
    • Kelly M says

      August 28, 2013 at 10:05 pm

      Hi Hayley! Sugars are included in the carb count in nutritional labels, so you don't need to worry about it unless you are on a specific low sugar diet.
      Reply
      • Hayley says

        August 28, 2013 at 10:06 pm

        Oh okay, thank you :)
        Reply
        • Kelly M says

          August 28, 2013 at 10:08 pm

          Of course!
          Reply
      • Nicole says

        October 6, 2013 at 8:41 pm

        Is it possible that fiber is already included ,subtracted) in the carb count on nutritional labels as well? For example if something has 10g carbs and 2g of fiber, the label would only list 8? Just curious.
        Reply
        • Kelly M says

          October 27, 2013 at 2:39 pm

          That's such a good point Nicole! My guess would be no because they have to list fiber separately, but I'm honestly not sure.
          Reply
  19. Jade says

    October 24, 2013 at 5:40 pm

    You, my dear, are fabulous. I saw comments below suggesting you have an eating disorder and that your blog is 'your friend'. I do hope you don't let any of these words get under your skin (I have a feeling though you are pretty tough skinned and wouldn't let any nonsense affect you). You are brilliant. You have a true talent and I am so glad I found your blog! x
    Reply
  20. Ray says

    January 20, 2014 at 1:49 am

    Reading through this post and your comments, and just wanted to say that your maturity and patience is just mind-blowing. You start out thanking people for being respectful when they call about calorie counts, proceed to an incredibly well-researched and educational post, and your comments to people who worry about your mental health are polite and mature. At your age, that's so admirable. And in addition, I bet that these recipes I'm totally about to stalk are going to be delicious. Keep doing you, girl.
    Reply
  21. applemoon says

    February 18, 2014 at 5:03 am

    Hello Kelly first I want to say how cute you are that @ur age u want to help people. I'm going to be 37 in 2 days and I'm currently 5'5" and weigh 148 which is 20 lbs overweight for my age. I try to calorie count but I stink @ math always have. I have just become overweight the last two years I have always been 120-130. Eating healthy is something that I enjoy always have until I started eating bad the older I got how ironic, anyhow as I stated how do I properly calorie count to eat only what I'm supposed to. Thank you
    Reply
  22. kara says

    February 27, 2014 at 5:43 pm

    Kelly, I just wanted to say that you are smart and to keep this up. There will be people out there telling you to be a normal high school student and stay off the blogs. Don't let anyone tell you what to do, especially if it's a passion and you enjoy it. Everyone lives a different life and will have different opinions. If you're doing something that is successful at 16, then you're way ahead of your generation. You rock! I'm waiting for more recipes! Xoxo!
    Reply
  23. Amy says

    April 19, 2014 at 3:45 am

    Ok I love this and had known about this but what gets me is the difference between insoluble and soluble fiber. Doesn't it matter in the caloric count which type of fiber it is and I thought your body does absorb one but not the other. Since the labels don't state which type of fiber, I assume it's all going to be absorbed so I end up not getting foods I want because the calories are reported too low. Thoughts on this?
    Reply
    • Kelly M says

      June 18, 2014 at 11:12 am

      Hi Amy! This is a GREAT question, but unfortunately I do not have an answer for you. This is a comment I got from a reader named Kae on the subject, so hopefully it will help: I am taking a nutrition class right now and according to our teacher, the FDA hasn’t taken a stance on fiber yet because people are still debating how fiber is digested. Evidently some people think soluble and insoluble fiber are digested differently and that you can get ‘some’ calories from fiber. Some scientists have suggested calculating 2 calories per gram of fiber just to be safe, but NO ONE AGREES ON ANYTHING (as usual). So I’m just going to take your advice and not count fiber and get to eat more ;)
      Reply
  24. Sydney says

    October 16, 2014 at 2:41 pm

    Why don't the companies use this system? I think it's great but why don't they?
    Reply
    • Dulcie de Kock says

      October 17, 2014 at 11:10 am

      That is an excellent question, Sydney! My guess would be is that because the FDA hasn't taken a stance on it and there are still various arguments on how fiber is digested, the companies have decided to stick to the traditional route. The food industry knows that they can't just randomly switch up the calories on everything without serious questioning from calorie-conscious buyers who have memorized or can research the typical amount of calories in a product. This situation is similar to how America still uses the imperial system instead of the metric system that the majority of the world measures with-many just think it's too much of a hassle to switch over! Hope that this helps:-)
      Reply
  25. Sydney says

    November 2, 2014 at 11:31 am

    Wow! How did you figure this out? The only thing I have to question is what about the added sugars? Doesn't sugar have calories? Thanks for this report, by the way
    Reply
    • Dulcie de Kock says

      November 4, 2014 at 7:23 am

      Thanks for your concern, Sydney! Since sugar counts as a carb, and is included within the carb count, you don’t have to account for it again. For example, if something has 8 grams of carbs, but it has 4 grams of fiber and 4 grams of sugar, you would just subtract the fiber to get 4 grams of carbs (4 x 4 = 16 calories). Hope this helps:-)
      Reply
  26. Robin says

    January 29, 2015 at 9:27 pm

    I am impressed by your "math-geniusness," yes, I'm declaring that that is a word! It does, however, make me sad that there is such an obsession with calorie counting these days. Don't count calories, make calories count. Individuals who are eating whole, unprocessed (preferably plant-based) foods with the occasional indulgence should not need to worry about calorie counting. Intuitive eating works wonders and I highly recommend it. Your weight will settle where it is meant to be. As a young woman who has struggled with anorexia for years, I can assure you that even for people without an eating disorder (especially a girl your age) calorie counting is an unhealthy practice. Best wishes!
    Reply
  27. Katelyn says

    March 31, 2015 at 1:25 pm

    This is amazing! I feel like a nutrition ninja! lol.... I can't wait to tell everybody I talk to in the next 24 hours!!!
    Reply
    • Kelly M says

      May 29, 2015 at 6:20 pm

      preach it! xo
      Reply
  28. Angela says

    April 28, 2015 at 7:09 am

    I am seriously lost by reading all these threads about inaccurate listings of protein bars etc. Especially quest bars.. Turns out that for the white chocolate raspberry flavor is 244 instead of 190 kcals (they state 190 cals). Because of the fibre. Does this mean that for every bar (musclepharm combar crunch for example or Oh yeah bars) I need to multiple the fibre by 4 grams to get the ACTUAL Calories that are in those bars? Take for example Musclepharm combar crunch. It has Amount Per Serving: Calories 210 Calories from Fat 63 Total Fat 7g 11% Saturated Fat 4g 20% Monounsaturated Fat 2g Polyunsaturated Fat 1g Trans Fat 0g Cholesterol 39mg 13% Sodium 459mg 19% Potassium 101mg 2% Total Carb. 28g 9% Dietary Fiber 12g 48% Sugars 5g Sugar Alcohol 1g Protein 20g 40% Does this mean I should multiple 12g of fibre * 4 kcals? That will give a total calories of : 63 kcals Fat 80 kcals protein 112 Kcals carbs: 255 kcals per bar? And then fibre : 12* 4 grams: 48 kcals so 1 bar has 303 Kcals in total? Please help me!
    Reply
  29. Vkey says

    September 10, 2015 at 5:37 am

    This is not entirely right because not all fibre are insoluble fibres, most foods have soluble fibre meaningsome of the fibre are digested. So before you subtract your fibre makesure its insoluble. And most products do this already.
    Reply
  30. christopher says

    September 19, 2015 at 11:56 am

    hi i enjoyed reading your article, but i am not sure your info is accurate ... i found your article from george mataljan, the whole foods author ... he states: "As background, different foods offer a different amount of calories per gram. For example, a gram of protein has 4 calories, a gram of carbohydrate has 4 calories, and a gram of fat has 9 calories. There's no clear scientific consensus on fiber's caloric contribution. The FDA has estimated the amount of caloric contribution due to bacterial degradation at about 1.5 calories per gram of fiber. For food labeling purposes, the guidelines do take into consideration the fiber content of that food and subtract the amount of fiber (in grams) from the total grams of carbohydrates and then multiply that number by 4 calories/gram for consistency in stating calories on the food label. replies from some of your other readers are also supportive of the notion that fiber does contribute a certain amount of calories ... therefore, subtracting out ALL of the calories associated with a food's fiber content will give you a misleading total calorie count ... anyway, thanks for drawing attention to this subject christopher
    Reply
  31. review says

    January 18, 2016 at 6:41 pm

    I was suggested this blog by my cousin. I am not positive whether this post is written by means of him as no one else know such detailed about my trouble. You're amazing! Thanks!
    Reply
  32. Angela says

    January 20, 2016 at 6:32 pm

    Thanks for this article! I wish there was a note on the label whether the fiber was already subtracted or not. I'm shooting for 1200 calories to lose weight but keep finding myself around 1500-1600 on my fitness pal. That's with 50-60 grams of fiber though ;). If I subtract those calories I'm right on goal...unless they were already subtracted.
    Reply
  33. Hannah says

    November 9, 2016 at 7:37 pm

    When calculating this information, I was a little confused as to whether I should add the total sugars amount as well. Do you know if the total carbs count also counts total sugars?
    Reply
    • Kelly M says

      November 11, 2016 at 11:19 am

      Hi Hannah! When calculating the total carbs, you simply take the total carb count and subtract the fiber count (but not adding or subtracting the sugar). So to answer your question, yes, total carbs includes sugar. Hope this helps!
      Reply
  34. RK says

    February 4, 2017 at 11:31 am

    THE COMPLETE FORMULA IS THIS: Amount of Total Carbohydrate Corrected = Total Carbohydrate (g) on the Label – Dietary Fiber (g) on the Label – 1/2 Sugar Alcohol (g) on the Label However Dr. Mike Roussell Said the Following: http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/ask-the-macro-manager-does-fiber-count-in-calories.html Don't worry about improving the accuracy of your calorie-counting by being technically correct about the contribution of fiber. It is wasted effort. If there is a caloric difference due to fiber, it's small enough that it's probably easily obliterated if you walk to work or take your dog for a stroll after dinner. I fully agree with Dr. Mike Roussell, and decided not to correct the amount of total carbohydrate being printed on the food labels because of the following reasons: a. In some countries, the food manufacturers don’t even list the amount of dietary fiber so you never know how much fiber is to be deducted from the total carbohydrate. So the deduction of dietary fiber from the total carbohydrate is not universally verified and validated when counting calories. b. If you go by “accuracy,” the counting of calories itself is by approximation only and there is no need to worry about the accuracy of the amount of carbohydrate. As a matter of fact when counting calories, all the aforementioned educators multiply the amount of carbohydrate by 4 instead of 4.1. If they want to count calories accurately, they should actually multiply the amount of carbohydrate in grams by 4.1 (but not by 4). So there was an error generated already by multiplying by 4. The carbohydrate actually offers 4.1 calories per gram (4 calories per gram is the approximation or rounded value). c. More than that, when you deduct the amount of dietary fiber from the total carbohydrate and multiply by 4, your total daily calorie intake is going to be lower than that without deduction, which could trick your brain to feel free to eat more because your total calorie intake was lower. As a result, you could gain weight by eating more. If you do not deduct the dietary fiber from total carbohydrate, then you feel satisfied by the total daily calorie instate, and then you could lose weight by eating less. d. Calorie counting should be used to compare the total daily calorie intake from one day to the another. It is the relative calorie counting that is important, but not the absolute calorie counting. From the approximate calorie count, you can either lower the total daily calorie intake by eating less or increase by eating more. The approximate calories counting, without worrying too much about the accuracy of calorie counting, should be used by keeping in mind that you should eventually eat less in an attempt to lose weight loss. That can be accomplished by using the MEASURING CUPS, by putting 3/4 cup instead 1 cup or by putting 1 cup instead of 1.5 cups, etc on your dinner plate. By counting the number cups you have been eating until today, you can easily lower the amount of food being consumed from tomorrow onwards, thereby accomplishing your weight loss goal. Healthy eating habits “such as eating whole foods” would allow you to consume lower calories, and lose weight. The accurate calorie counting is not going to help you lose weight. I recently lost 40 pounds of weight and 12 inches around my waist, and reversed sleep apnea from which I have been suffering for 2 years. Most probably I was the only one in the whole world who shockingly reversed sleep apnea by losing weight.
    Reply
  35. Richard Robinson says

    May 25, 2017 at 4:42 am

    Good article, revealing some new things. I would like to add that calorie counting is not suitable for everyone, but many people find it really effective for losing weight and staying fit. http://beautyandhealthlife.com/how-to-count-calories-to-lose-weight/
    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Link Love 22/2 | says:
    February 22, 2013 at 2:02 pm
    [...] whilst I DON’T count calories anymore this post was really thought provoking- what do you [...]
    Reply
  2. Healthy Spinach and Artichoke Dip says:
    February 16, 2015 at 9:31 pm
    […] carb version, use almond meal instead of the panko.Nutritional information calculated with this method using panko breadcrumbs and Castello light havarti cheese. Nutrition Information […]
    Reply
  3. The 10 Best Coconut Flour Recipes of All Time says:
    August 28, 2015 at 11:17 pm
    […] veteran, you are well aware of my love affair with coconut flour. It’s low carb, lower in net calories than pretty much every flour out there, and it’s also pretty flipping […]
    Reply
  4. Low Carb Peanut Butter Cookies says:
    December 30, 2015 at 3:02 am
    […] Net Carbs: 5 grams […]
    Reply

Leave a Reply to Kelly M Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Single Serving Cheesecake Brownies

Single Serving Protein Chocolate Chip Muffin

Three Ingredient Pasta Bolognese for One

Giant Single Serving Cinnamon Bun

Healthy Single Serving Ice Cream (No Ice Cream Maker Needed!)

Single Serving Vegan Mac and Cheese

Single Serving Mac and Cheese

The Perfect Dinner Formula: 30 Minute Crispy Noodles

Healthy Cowboy Cookies

Single Serving Recipes

Greatest Hits

High Protein Double Chocolate Muffins

Single Serving Brownies

Single Serving Cinnamon Roll

The Best Healthy Zucchini Bread

Coconut Flour Flatbread

Low Carb Waffles

Subscribe

Get the latest recipes delivered with love to your inbox

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025

Design by Deluxe Designs